Comparison

humux vs.
OpenClaw

How humux compares to OpenClaw — the most popular personal AI agent with 25+ messaging channels and cross-platform desktop apps.

OpenClaw — 381k ★ — TypeScript — MIT

Feature humux OpenClaw
Self-hosted
Single container deploy
Messaging channels 3 25+
Telegram (per-agent bots)
WhatsApp
CLI channel
Email (IMAP/SMTP)
Calendar (CalDAV)
Contacts (CardDAV)
Persistent memory
Voice (STT + TTS)
Markdown skills
Subagents
Scheduled tasks / cron
Web search
Browser automation
Encrypted secrets vault
Granular permissions
Admin web UI
LLM providers 6 ~20

Info gathered from public repos and docs. Products evolve — check each project for current state.

🦞

Where OpenClaw wins

  • 25+ messaging channels (Signal, iMessage, Discord, Slack, and many more)
  • Cross-platform desktop apps for macOS, Linux, and Windows
  • Largest ecosystem and community of any personal AI agent (381k stars)
  • More LLM providers (~20 vs humux's 6)
  • Sponsored by OpenAI, GitHub, NVIDIA, and Vercel
⚡

Where humux wins

  • Built-in email, calendar, and contacts — not available in OpenClaw
  • Single container deploy (OpenClaw requires multiple services)
  • Scheduled tasks and cron jobs (absent in OpenClaw)
  • Browser automation with persistent profiles (not in OpenClaw)
  • Encrypted vault, granular permissions, and admin web UI

The bottom line

Choose OpenClaw if you need 20+ messaging platforms, desktop apps, or the largest community. Choose humux if you want a complete personal productivity agent with email, calendar, scheduling, and a single-container deployment.

← See the full comparison table

Run your own personal AI

One container. All integrations built in. Your data stays yours.

Quick Start Star on GitHub